![]() ![]() Remove the symlink from the current volume and create the new symlink to the new volume.Use “mv” to move the data between the old and new volume, you may need to create the folder first.Use “ls” against to find your package folder name.Login to Synology using SSH and elevate to root.Stop your application via the Synology package center UI.I moved all the data using the internal file manager, but the package installation remained in place. Not sure how DSM apportions workload between different volumes on the same set of physical disks.I have a Synology 8-bay NAS used for home-lab purposes, but also doubles as local home storage as well.Īs part of upgrades, I was decommissioning a volume for a new one with higher capacity drives, however I had Plex installed on the volume to be decommissioned. ![]() Thing is, regardless of there being 1 volume or 2, they'd both be using the same 4 physical drives (in that single RAID5 array). "Using a single volume will work as well, but again depending on the usage of that particular set of drives some services might feel the burden" If they could be used for storage, they'd be a great candidate for running VMs on. Pity that the NVMe bays can't be used for raw storage, but only as cache for the main drive slots (if I've understood them correctly). ![]() Would mean sacrificing a main drive slot. Unfortunately, the RS1619xs+ doesn't have that same extra SSD slots option. Went back to the original Synology plan (has been brewing for over a year). But then DeadBolt arose, and the more I read about the QNAP OS and general approach to security, the less inclined I became to order one. Would have been ideal for this job, and looks like a great hardware box. "2 separate volumes with different drives (hdd vs ssd) it would make a lot of sense."Ī few weeks ago I was about to place an order for a QNAP TS-977XU-RP-3600, because in addition to its 4 x 3.5" drive slots it also has 5 x SSD drive bays along the top. So, should at least 2 Volumes be created in the Storage Pool? Or is one sufficient?Īny guidance or thoughts from anyone please? Follow the instructions to complete the setup. You can choose whether you would like to be notified each time when the free space falls 1% below this threshold value.ĥ. Specify a name and set the Low on space threshold. Go to Storage Manager and create a volume that will be used as storage for virtual machines first.ģ. The volume will be used as the storage on which the virtual machines will be stored."īut it doesn't really say whether that volume (or those volumes plural) should/must be separate from any other data storage volume.Īnd the Storage page here says:- Storage | Virtual Machine Manager - Synology Knowledge Center To create a storage:ġ. The following Synology KB article says:- Requirements and Limitations | Virtual Machine Manager - Synology Knowledge Center "Create Btrfs volumes to be used as storage for virtual machines:īefore installing the Virtual Machine Manager package, please set up at least one Btrfs volume on each Synology NAS server. Rather than having one one single volume, would I be better advised to create at least 2 separate Volumes - one for the simple file data (shared folders etc), M365 Backups, etc., and another separate Volume for storage of the (probably 2) VMs created in VM Manager? Or will in be fine to store the VMs on the same volume as that used by the shared folders? When powering up the NAS for the first time today, I let the system create a single RAID5 Storage Pool from the 4 x 10TB disks, and a single Volume from ALL of the available space. No data copied to NAS yet, so can still easily delete everything done so far. There will not (at this stage anyway) be a second NAS for fault-tolerance. Most data is now in the cloud, but do need to retain an on-site copy (hence the NAS), have a mechanism for M365 Backup (Synology Active Backup for M365) and a containerised SQL database.Īlso need to run at least one Windows Domain Controller (synching with Azure AD), hence plan to use Virtual Machine Manager and create new DC VM (maybe 2) on NAS. It's intended to replace our no-longer-really-needed pair of VMware ESX hosts + storage, running several Windows servers:- file, SQL, line-of-business app, plus two domain controllers. Just purchased a new RS1619xs+, inc 4 x 10TB disks & extra RAM. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |